Monday, July 23, 2018

Deathstalker 2 RETRO REVIEW!!! Hit the Synth, Bucko!

Deathstalker 2 Retro-Review
 
As we approach the year 2019, it should be noted that the world of Sword & Sorcery film-making has seen leaps in improved effects, costuming, and story-telling. Even some of the most lackluster sci-fi channel films would be seen as miracles in cinema had they been seen back when I was a younger boy- at the risk of dating myself, I am in my mid-forties and I grew up on Krull, Hawk the Slayer, and the Deathstalker franchise. And yes, these films were a franchise trilogy that were only loosely connected by the character of Deathstalker himself. A character whose actor would change from one movie to the next, who never spoke about the events of the previous movies, and whose legend only consistently named him a Prince of thieves.
 
The first film received cult status as producer Roger Corman cashed in on the Conan craze, featuring swords, sorcery, scantily clad babes, and featuring Playboy playmate Barbi Benton as a princess in peril. But the film knows precisely what it is- and it’s something that would never be made in this day and age. The “Hero” (Rick Hill) is a misogynistic cad who rescues a damsel from gang rape only to go about raping her himself, is armed with the Sword of Justice, and goes about slaying creatures and men by the bucketful until eventually making his way to the Princess. It’s all guts and glory.
 
And it made enough of its money back to justify not only one, but two sequels!
 
In the third film, the hero is played by John Allen Nelson and he once again goes on a quest to aid a princess in peril. See a pattern here? The film was featured on an episode of MST3K and is the last of the Deathstalker movies to be produced to date.
 
But the second film?  Ah, let’s speak about the second film in the trilogy for a bit.
 
The second film features a decidedly wry John Terlesky (Chopping Mall) as the Prince of Thieves, one part Han Solo and one part Errol Flynn, a wise-cracking swashbuckler in an age of mythic fantasy. After rescuing a peasant woman (Monique Gabrielle), she tells him she is a seer and that he is destined to help save a princess from an evil sorcerer (John La Zar). Toni Naples also casts a shadow as the nefarious Sultana, a witch or warrior queen or mercenary- you know what? I don’t know what she was supposed to be and I really don’t care. And, although we are just rehashing the plot from the first film, Deathstalker doesn’t seem too impressed with the heroic deeds laid out ahead of him. Luckily our hero is easily swayed by the promise of fortune and glory, so off he goes with his slightly less than competent Seer. 
 
A huge change in this film is the “self-aware” dialogue, with the protagonists realizing they’re in danger moments before it happens, flowery insults (The village idiot and two runners up?) and moments that bend the fourth wall to the breaking point. Terlesky and Gabrielle have a lot of fun chemistry on camera, their playful banter seems natural and playful throughout the film and of course leads to the inevitable love scene. Also, Terlesky seems very athletic in the role and leaps to action on more than one occasion. How he never became a major actor is a mystery to me, but he’s since gone on to success as a director on several television projects. Gabrielle made a career in soft core adult feature films, including the title role of Emanuelle 5 after famously appearing in Bachelor Party.  
 
This movie is just a fun ride. Now you may poo-poo the cheesy effects, the bad make-up design on the orcs (Literally men with pig masks), or laugh at the badly painted set design but you would be wholly missing the point. This isn’t Conan, this isn’t a land of high adventure, this is a z-grade production and it knows exactly what it is. Have fun with it! Enjoy it for what it is, and not for what other movies are. I know that sounds like I’m trying to justify it’s existence or making excuses, but the film really works far better than either of the two other features in the Deathstalker franchise. It’s a treat for its short runtime and it’s good revisit to see how Sword and Sorcery movies were presented before Lord of the Rings made them popular.
 
7 out of 10 (Though, in fairness it probably deserves less) and a high recommend.  
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment