It Follows
Human sexuality is terrifying.
There
are awkward years where you’re not certain about how you feel, where
you’re afraid to express those emotions, where physical contact could
mean anything and where we fumble around, get confused, and then there’s
the possibility of so many ramifications; Pregnancy, Venereal disease,
past relationships, and just flat out being used or being a user. “It
Follows” is the result of a sexual encounter gone awry- an allegory for
facing the consequences of sex and all the little horrors that could
result. Only this film makes the “horror” for more personal.
Jay
has a sexual encounter with a boy she’s only starting to get to know-
only to find out that he’s really only using her to “pass on” the curse
of a murderous entity that will stalk, follow, and eventually murder her
unless she passes the curse to another. But even if she does pass the
curse, the entity will return once it has done its business with the new
carrier- a cycle that will continue indefinitely unless she and her
friends can find some way to stop the creature.
There
was a lot of hype around this movie when I finally sat down to give it a
go- which may have played as a bit of a detriment for me as a viewer. I
was so primed for the film that the slow methodical pacing had me
clawing at my chair for something to happen- and when it happens, the
movie absolutely delivers! We see the creature just out of the
peripheral of the camera’s focus- a figure who takes on various forms as
it slowly approaches our lead from behind. There are some weird angles
being used here to show all of the characters in a given scene, yet it
rarely focuses on more than one or two throughout the story. The acting
is very good and there are some truly sympathetic characters to be
found, even as Jay struggles with her decisions on whether to pass the
curse on down or just face the creature on her own.
That’s
all I’m going to say about the movie, detail-wise. And, honestly, the
less you know about the film going in, I think the better your viewing
experience is going to be. I think it’s a fun little ride and definitely
a worthy entry into the horror genre- but my honest opinion is that it
may be one of the ten best movies I’ve seen this past year, but it’s not
at the top of the list.
4 out of 5; a strong rental
Pro-Wrestlers vs. Zombies
We
already know what this is. The title says it all. We have zombies and a
couple of low grade professional wrestling “celebrities” getting down
and dirty in a bloody gruesome mess of a film that tries very hard. And I
honestly wanted to love the film for the pure cheese and love that was
obviously on display, but the film never really managed to rise above
its many flaws. And, perhaps the biggest flaw, falls on the shoulders of
professional wrestlers unwilling to really engage and commit to the
project at hand. And that’s a real shame when it comes down to it.
Shane
Douglas stars as “himself”, a wrestling villain who manages to snap the
neck of an opponent in the ring and send him to his maker. The
wrestler’s brother comes for revenge and sells his soul in order to
raise the dead and lay a trap for Douglas and a small roster of mixed
legends and Independent wrestling stars. And this is where the film
finds its primary problem- Shane Douglas, as himself, is really just a
parody of the Franchise character he used to bring ECW to prominence in
the 90’s. But while he is good at playing the “character” in the ring,
he never uses the film’s material to lend any depth to the villain he’s
played for so long. He is largely a one note character and he is
supposed to be one of the three primary stars of the film- it’s Shane
that the zombies are targeting, it’s Shane who committed a murder in the
middle of a ring, and it’s Shane whose family are used as Zombies
(including a brother named “Troy”, which is ironic since Douglas real
name is “Troy Martin”). But he never commits to the film, only to the
character of The Franchise- and it hurts the film on the whole.
Matt
Hardy and his girlfriend, Reby Sky, also step into the film as the
“couple” who are always looking to hook up. And while they may have had a
real life romance off the side, Hardy is atrocious on the screen and is
not just an unlikeable character but he comes off as totally clueless
when it comes to delivering lines. It was as though someone fed him the
lines as the movie filmed with a constant look of nervous panic every
time the camera would swing in his direction. Other “indie” wrestlers
appear to focus on their gimmicks and ultimately get swarmed by zombies
in order to pad out numbers. But with such a focus on gimmicks, they’re
failing to live up to the potential of having wrestlers defend
themselves against zombies.
Kurt
Angle stops in for a cup of coffee and leads me to believe that he was
doing someone a favor for a single afternoon. No big deal with that, but
as one of the top names billed in the film I would have expected to at
least see some sort of an arc for the man.
But
where Shane Douglas and others fail, Roddy Piper succeeds- he’s been
friends with Shane for years and he’s a true road Veteran who has seen
it all and done it all. He knows that his buddy is a jerk but he
attributes it to the gimmick and is a constant apologist for the other
man’s behavior. Piper brings a full commitment to the film and plays it
straight- You actually believe he’s present in the moment and that his
friends are being slaughtered around him. He comes across as a
protective father-figure and a man who wants to do good by the people in
his life. There’s an emotional moment between him and fellow legend,
Hacksaw Jim Duggan, that actually made me feel bad. Both men delivered
what they needed to and had the film found a focus with them, rather
than Douglas, I believe the movie could have worked so much better.
There
are a few editing hiccups, the video quality isn’t the best, and the
“jock rock” soundtrack runs a little against the mood at times. But the
film doesn’t totally fail to accomplish the task at hand and a little
more experience behind the camera may give the director a little more
traction in years to come. And as one of Roddy Piper’s final
performances, fans will honestly be moved by his character arc and
quality he brings to a project as silly as this.
Truth
be told, there are worse ways to spend an evening and love for
wrestling is an absolute “must” in order to pick up on a number of
references throughout the film.
2.5 out of 5. Weak Rental.
Lost After Dark
Billed
as a “throwback” to the 1980’s slasher genre, “Lost at Dark” plays with
the usual tropes and delivers a few interesting turns along the way. It
is, at its core, a play on the Tarantino/Rodriguez-inspired
“Grindhouse” double feature from a few years ago. With damaged footage,
cut scenes, and the usual wear and tear seen throughout- the film pays
homage to the horror flicks of the 80’s and strives to capture the look
and feel throughout its’ runtime.
A
group of High School friends decide to ditch the dance and drive out to
a cabin in the woods, but never actually make it that far. They are
pursued by their Gung-ho Vietnam Veteran vice-principle, played by
Robert Patrick. The teens break down en route and try to find help from
an old manor house they come across- there they come face to face with a
cannibal wild man who brutally murders a number of the teens. The
deaths are gory, there are some truly brutal scenes, and some tropes are
played with in order to assault the audience expectations. Few moments
are actually played for comedy, however- as the film does remain
grounded in its sense of horror, though several moments do seem to have
an ironic sense of humor to them. Robert Patrick, especially, is good in
an “over the top” performance.
3.5,
the film is better than I expected it to be and fairly enjoyable, but
not a definite “must see” on the scale. If you’re a fan of slasher films
and you enjoyed the lesser known backwood-killer movies, this is pretty
much on par.
Furious 7
In
the interest of full disclosure, I haven’t seen all of the Fast &
Furious films to date. But the truth of the matter is that you can’t be a
cinephile without at least hearing about the series and I have seen the
first and second films in the action series. And, much like a great
many other people, I was honestly moved by the stories of Paul Walker
and how the film would address his very real death that took place
shortly after principle photography wrapped and required use of a double
and CGI for a number of shots that would feature the Fast and Furious
star.
Furious 7 picks
up right where the previous film left off- which is to say, I have no
idea where I’m starting out except that some guy I don’t remember was
killed by a character played by Jason Statham and that makes Dom (Vin
Diesel) an unhappy camper. He and his “family”- this includes Paul
Walker’s ex-cop character, Dom’s sister (now married to the ex-cop),
Ludicris, and others I’m honestly too tired to remember all jamming into
some cars and driving around to do stuff and miraculously survive.
Somewhere along the way the Rock winds up in the hospital with a broken
arm, Kurt Russell comes traipsing on in, and I’m fairly certain we’re
about to have a visit from the cast of The Expendables at some point in
time because that would actually make a lot of sense. There’s a computer
program that tracks people, a hacker, some more cars, and a bunch of
stuff that blows up along the way. And Dom doesn’t have friends, he’s
got “Family”… so that’s what we’ve got developing here.
Look,
I love stupid action films and this is really as stupid an action film
as you are ever likely to get- The cast is fun, the dialogue is corny,
and the stunts are all amazing. No one is surviving this stuff and Jason
Statham is over the top as an egregious villain looking to kill Dom for
having killed his brother in what I assume was a previous movie. And if
there was ever a movie you didn’t want to know anything about, this is
the one. I’m sure there are some great storyline purposes being driven
home here, but the less I knew the more outlandish and ridiculous the
movie seemed and that made it so much more worthwhile. I’m going to go
back and watch them in reverse order just to see if the same experience
could be had in successive numbers.
4.5 out of 5.